Why Biden’s Proposed 44.6% Capital Gains Tax Might Not Matter

Last Updated on April 25, 2024

Fleming Headshot
Written by

Key Takeaways:

  • Biden’s Proposed Tax Increase: President Biden’s plan introduces a 44.6% federal capital gains tax, aimed specifically at high-income individuals, marking the highest rate proposed in U.S. history.
  • Limited Impact on Average Crypto Investors: Despite concerns, this tax increase is expected to primarily affect a small, wealthy portion of the crypto community, not the average investor earning around $25,000 globally.
  • Broader Political Context: The tax proposals, including a controversial tax on unrealized gains for those with assets over $100 million, seem more focused on political positioning and messaging than substantial fiscal change.

President Biden’s plan to introduce a federal capital gains tax of 44.6% seems unlikely to impact the majority of cryptocurrency enthusiasts, say experts in the field of crypto taxation.

In what has become the highest proposed rate in U.S. history, Biden’s move aims to target the affluent, yet it’s expected to have minimal effect on average crypto investors.

The notable rate was detailed in a March 11 document from the Department of Treasury, stating its activation would depend on the passage of two proposals: an increase in the top ordinary tax rate and a hike in the investment income tax rate.

Despite the buzz it created on social media, where it has been a topic of discussion for over a month, the response from the crypto community suggests that the impact will be limited to a very narrow segment of the population.

Data from TripleA, a crypto payment company, shows that the global average annual income for crypto investors is around $25,000, factoring in nations with lower average earnings than the U.S.

This statistic underscores the gap between the typical crypto user and the tax proposal’s target demographic.

Also in the spotlight is Biden’s budget proposal, which includes a contentious 25% tax on unrealized gains for the ultra-wealthy.

This proposal has drawn severe criticism, with some calling it “insane” and a potential risk to economic stability.

However, this measure would only affect individuals holding assets over $100 million, making it another topic that, while significant in discourse, is not pertinent to the majority of those discussing it online.

Ultimately, the proposals appear to be more about political strategy than fiscal impact, aiming to resonate with lower-income voters by positioning the administration against the ultra-rich.

About The Author

Fleming Headshot
Written by

News Reporter

Fleming Airunugba, a seasoned Web3 and crypto content expert, leverages his deep understanding of blockchain technology to bring the latest and most impactful news to the crypto community.

With a knack for engaging storytelling and strategic content creation, Fleming is dedicated to educating and inspiring his audience with insightful analysis on cryptocurrencies, NFTs, and the future of digital finance.

Check Fleming out on: